Ready to use adaptation in a snake

Plasticity affects a range of biological phenomena including behaviour, ecological interactions and morphology. An example of the last is that of plasticity in the head size of tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus)1.

Tiger snakes live in southern and central Australia and are venomous carnivores that prey on small vertebrates such as frogs, birds and mice. In addition to their ancestral populations on the Australian mainland, there are several populations on islands. Some of these were established thousands of years ago when sea levels were lower, enabling migration to take place, others much more recently (less than 100 years ago) through human activity. It happens that their prey animals tend to be larger on the islands than on the mainland, to an extent that makes them more difficult to capture and swallow. Once again, plasticity and subsequent assimilation are how these animals adapt to this problem.

Image credit: David Cook Wildlife Photography
https://www.flickr.com/people/kookr/
https://uk.inaturalist.org/photos/51890

Generally, island snakes are bigger than their relatives on the mainland, and this includes having larger heads. Experiments show that head size in snakes from recently colonised island populations is plastic in that snakes fed on larger mice develop larger heads than those fed on smaller ones. However, that plasticity is not seen in snakes from islands colonised several thousands of years ago; these snakes have a large head phenotype regardless of the size of mice they are continually fed on in experiments. The long established island tiger snake populations therefore appear to have large heads by default, i.e. they have assimilated large head phenotypes of a formerly plastic head size range.

Having shown adaptation arising from plasticity in wood frogs and tiger snakes, we now go on to discuss plasticity’s relevance to evolution, and how this contrasts with the traditional view.

Scroll to bottom of page to comment

References

  1. Aubret, Fabien, and Richard Shine. ‘Genetic Assimilation and the Postcolonization Erosion of Phenotypic Plasticity in Island Tiger Snakes’. Current Biology: CB 19, no. 22 (1 December 2009): 1932–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.061. []

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *